Bridging Multi-Campus Distances with Digital Closeness: An Empirical Dive into Face-to-Face Extended (FTFx) Instruction

Document Type : Field Reports

Authors

1 Associate Professor of e-learning at National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU), Taiwan.

2 MSc in e-learning, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU), Taiwan.

10.22034/lss.2025.511178.1035
Abstract
In the context of increasing university mergers, this study investigates the use of technology to facilitate cross-campus teaching interaction and enhance student learning experiences. Focusing on National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU), we compared Face-to-Face Extended (FTFx), traditional Face-to-Face (FTF), and 2D Virtual Classroom (VC) course modalities. Employing a quasi-experimental design, we analyzed the flow state and discussion behaviors of students enrolled in the "Learning and Reading Comprehension Strategies" course during "World Café" discussions in 2022 and 2023. Data were collected through questionnaires and classroom video recordings, and analyzed using quantitative content analysis and lag sequential analysis. Results indicated no significant differences in flow state and discussion behaviors between FTFx and FTF courses, both of which were significantly higher than VC courses. Discussion sequences were similar across FTFx, FTF, and VC. The findings suggest that the FTFx model is a viable solution for synchronous extended classrooms in multi-campus universities, promoting cross-campus resource sharing and student interaction while maintaining the benefits of traditional face-to-face instruction. This study provides insights for the future development of higher education.

Keywords

Subjects

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., & Borokhovski, E., et al. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research. 79(3), 1243-1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analytics. Cambridge University Press.
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. Berrett-Koehler.
City Square Associates. (2019, January 8). HBX rebrands to Harvard Business School Online to help extend the reach of online programs. Harvard Business School Online. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/hbx-rebrands-to-harvard-business-school-online
Chen, K.-Z., & Yeh, H. -H. (2021). Acting in secret: Interaction, knowledge construction and sequential discussion patterns of partial role-assignment in a MOOC. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6979
Chen, K.-Z., & Oakley, B. (2020). Redeveloping a global MOOC to be more locally relevant: Design-based research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0178-6
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning together virtually. In R. C. Clark (Ed.), E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Pfeiffer/John Wiley & Sons.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.
DeMatthews, D., Knight, D., Reyes, P., Benedict, A., & Callahan, R. (2020). From the field: Educational research during a pandemic. Educational Researcher, 49, 398-402. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20938761
Dillon, E., Williams, B., Ajayi, A., Bright, Z., Rogers, Q. K-B. C., Lewis, M., Esema, J., & Clinkscale, B. (2021). Evaluating face-to-face vs. virtual pedagogical coding review sessions in the CS classroom: An HBCU case study. 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620586
Fontichiaro, K., & Stephens, W. S.  (2021). Blurring the boundaries between home and school: How videoconference-based schooling places American education’s cultural values at risk during COVID-19. Journal of Children and Media, 15(1), 96-100, https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1860101
Froiland, J. M., & Smith, L. (2014). Advancing the discussion about systematic classroom behavioral observation, a product review of Tenny, J. (2010). eCOVE observation software. Journal of Attention Disorders, 18(4), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712436585
Gambrell, L. B., & Almasi, J. F. (Eds.). (1996). Lively discussions! Fostering engaged reading. International Reading Association.
Guardino, C. A., & Fullerton, E. (2010). Changing behaviors by changing the classroom environment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(6), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200601
Hwang, G. J., & Chien, S. Y. (2024). Broad sense and narrow sense perspectives on the metaverse in education: Roles of virtual reality, augmented reality, artificial intelligence and pedagogical theories. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2024.10058828
Jacobs, J. K., Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00036-1
Juarez, B. C., & Critchfield, M. (2021). Virtual classroom observation: Bringing the classroom experience to pre-service candidates. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(3), 228-245, https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1859436
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Li, S. -C., & Chen, K.-Z. (2022). Analysing behavioral sequences of online learners: Lag Sequential Analysis using GSEQ. In SAGE Research Methods: Doing Research Online. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529607918
Loureiro, A., & Bettencourt, T. (2014). The use of virtual environments as an extended classroom – A case study with adult learners in tertiary education. Procedia Technology, 13, 97–106.
Loureiro, A., Santos, A., & Bettencourt, T. (2012). Virtual worlds as an extended classroom. In  C. S. Lányi (ed.), Applications of Virtual Reality, 89-108. InTech.
Mangione, G. R. J.,  & Cannella, G. (2021). Small school, smart schools: Distance education in remoteness conditions. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 26, 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09480-4
Manning, T., Sheehy, K., & Ceballos, L. (2020). Making mentoring work online. The Learning Professional, 41(4), 56-58.
Marx, A., Fuhrer, U., & Hartig, T. (1999). Effects of classroom seating arrangements on children's question-asking. Learning Environments Research, 2(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009901922191
Narayanan, R., Rangan, V. P., & Gopalakrishnan, U. (2019). Multiparty gaze preservation through perspective switching for interactive eLearning environments. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78, 17461–17494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7078-y
Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. Springer.
Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 745-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.019
Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 35, 6-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/968464.968467
Ramlatchan, M. & Watson, G. S. (2020). Enhancing instructor credibility and immediacy in the design of distance learning systems and virtual classroom environments. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.51869/92mrgsw
Ramlatchan, M., & Whitehurst, C. (2019). The social presence benefits of synchronous, interactive video in online classes. https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings19/2019/19_27.pdf
Tate, E. (2017, March).  Teaching in two places at once. Inside Highered. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2017/03/08/technology-allows-teaching-two-places-once
Schweitzer, L., & Duxbury, L. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x
van den Berg, Y.H.M., Segers, E., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Changing peer perceptions and victimization through classroom arrangements: A field experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9567-6
Wang, W., & Han, M. (2015). Quantitative analysis of the speech of the teachers and students in high school English classroom–based on information technology-based interaction analysis system. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2107-2111. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0510.18
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265, 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1145/329124.329126
World Economic Forum. (2019, July 2). Top 10 Emerging Technologies 2019. https://www.weforum.org/reports/top-10-emerging-technologies-2019
Yang, F., & Luo, W. (2020). Sharing cloud platform applied to teaching system reform based on “5G+Smart Education” innovation. Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Information Science and Education (ICISE-IE) (pp. 617-620).
Zhao, X., & McClure, C. D. (2022). Gather.Town: A gamification tool to promote engagement and establish online learning communities for language learners. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221097216

  • Receive Date 17 November 2024
  • Revise Date 18 January 2025
  • Accept Date 25 February 2025