International Journal of Learning Spaces Studies
Online ISSN: 2980-8995

Evaluating the "ATA Virtual Lab" based on Everett Rogers Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI)

Document Type : Original Research Manuscripts

Authors

Mohammad Hosein Shad 1
Javad Hatami 2
Esmaeil Azim 3

1 MA of EduTech graduated from Tarbiat Modares University

2 Professor in Educational Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Educational Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

10.22034/lss.2025.511045.1034
Abstract
This study aims to elucidate the necessity of utilizing the "Ata Virtual Science Laboratory" in elementary science education and to assess the performance of this simulated software. As the first virtual laboratory in Iran, alongside the limited availability of simulation software, this innovation plays a crucial role in deepening and accelerating the learning of experimental aspects in elementary science curricula. Accordingly, the objective of this research is to assess the success or failure of the "Ata Virtual Science Laboratory" based on the criteria of innovation diffusion. The theoretical and practical framework selected for this study is Everett Rogers' globally recognized Innovation Diffusion Theory. The five key criteria of this model (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability) provide a comprehensive foundation for evaluating any innovation. Methodologically, this research follows a quantitative approach in data collection and is categorized as descriptive-survey research. The statistical population of the study comprises elementary school teachers in Iran, with a sample of 70 teachers from four districts of Karaj and the Kaghazkonan region in East Azerbaijan province. The sampling method was non-probabilistic and convenience-based. For data analysis, an independent t-test and statistical techniques (descriptive and inferential) were employed. The results indicate that, from the teachers' perspective, the Ata Virtual Science Laboratory aligns with the five attributes of Rogers' theory. The level of alignment or success of all components was above average and statistically significant. Finally, research limitations were discussed, and practical and research-based recommendations were provided for future studies.

Keywords

Virtual Laboratory
Evaluation
Innovation
Everett Rogers' Innovation Diffusion Theory
Subjects
Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2011). The TriLab, a novel ICT-based triple access mode laboratory education model. Computers & Education, 56(1), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.023
Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Kolil, V., Diwakar, S., & Raman, R. (2020). Innovation adoption and diffusion of virtual laboratories. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i09.11685
Al-Duhani, F., Saat, R. M., & Abdullah, M. N. S. (2024). Effectiveness of web-based virtual laboratory on grade eight students’ self-regulated learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), em2410. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14282
 Bakhshyarvand, S., Birami Nia, B., Parvin, S., & Vatankhah, F. (2022). Using virtual laboratories to increase academic motivation and improve learning. 17th National Conference on Psychology, Social Sciences, and Education. [in Persian]
Cirus, L., & Simonova, I. (2020, August). Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory applied on primary education: Case study of Czech teachers. In 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 33-37). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00017
 Cirus, L., & Simonova, I. (2021). Pupils’ digital literacy reflected in teachers’ attitudes towards ICT: Case study of the Czech Republic. SN Computer Science, 2(3), 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00567-y
Lestari, D. P., Supahar, Paidi, Suwarjo, & Herianto. (2023). Effect of science virtual laboratory combination with demonstration methods on lower-secondary school students’ scientific literacy ability in a science course. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16153-16175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11857-8
 Durkaya, F. (2023). Virtual laboratory use in science education with digitalization. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2022.00141
Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257498
Elmoazen, R., Saqr, M., Khalil, M., & Wasson, B. (2023). Learning analytics in virtual laboratories: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00244-y
Fattahi, M., & Sadeghi, Q. (2015). The impact of innovation and creativity on relationship marketing and organizational performance. International Conference on Research in Science and Technology. [in Persian]
Hosseinkhah, A. (2008). A review of the diffusion of innovation theory in the field of education. Journal of Educational Innovations, 26(7), 151-178. [in Persian]
Luliyarti, D. S., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2021). Development of inquiry-based multimedia learning module with PhET simulation in Newton’s law of motion. 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.071
Nofal, B. M., & Khalaf, I. (2021). Using Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory to implement the healthy schools’ national accreditation. Medico-Legal Update, 21(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i3.2980
Rini, E. F. S., & Aldila, F. T. (2023). Practicum activity: Analysis of science process skills and students’ critical thinking skills. Integrated Science Education Journal, 4(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.322
Saddadi, M. (2019). The necessity of reform in science education in Iran. Research in Chemistry Education, 1(3), 1–4. [in Persian]
Salehi, K., Ghazemi, M., Fallahi, V., & Namdari, V. (2016). Cognitive thematic analysis of the lived experiences of professors regarding the quality of virtual education programs. Applied Psychological Research Journal (Psychology and Educational Sciences). [in Persian]
Santos, M. L., & Prudente, M. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in science education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11, 12.
Sapriati, A., Jayanti Suhandoko, A., Yundayani, A., Karim, A., Kusmawan, U., Adnan, H. M., & Azhary Suhandoko, A. (2023). The effect of virtual laboratories on improving students’ SRL: An umbrella systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030222
Sever, S., Yurumezoglu, K., & Oguz-Unver, A. (2010). Comparison teaching strategies of videotaped and demonstration experiments in inquiry-based science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5619-5624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.916
 Vasiliadou, R. (2020). Virtual laboratories during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 482–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21407
Wang, C., Ma, Y., & Wu, F. (2020). Comparative learning performance and mental involvement in collaborative inquiry learning: three modalities of using virtual lever manipulative. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 587-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09838-4
 Wilson, J. (2001). Educational innovation for development. Bangkok: UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

  • Receive Date 07 January 2025
  • Revise Date 16 February 2025
  • Accept Date 25 February 2025

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us