Teaching creativity to teachers in Singapore, Finland, Scotland, Australia, Japan, Malaysia and Iran

Document Type : Reviews

Authors

1 PHD candidate of curriculum studies, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor in Educational Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Educational Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor of Educational Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

10.22034/lss.2026.550409.1051
Abstract
The 21st century has brought rapid changes in technology, society, and education, transforming the role of teachers and the expectations placed upon educational systems. Among the skills that teachers need today, creativity stands out as a core competency, enabling educators to nurture innovative thinking, adaptability, and problem-solving in their students. This study explores how teacher education programs in seven countries—Singapore, Finland, Scotland, Australia, Japan, Malaysia, and Iran—support the development of creativity among pre-service teachers.
A descriptive–analytical comparative review was conducted, drawing on peer-reviewed articles, national curriculum frameworks, policy documents, and official teacher education reports published between 2010 and 2024. Data were collected using AI-assisted research tools alongside traditional academic databases. The documents were examined through thematic content analysis to identify key strategies, pedagogical approaches, and institutional practices aimed at fostering creativity in teacher education.
The findings show that while all countries have made efforts to strengthen teacher preparation, notable differences exist in program structure, practical experience integration, and the emphasis on reflective teaching. Shared features include curricula that actively incorporate creativity, strong connections between theory and classroom practice, and encouragement of professional autonomy. Specific approaches include Singapore and Finland’s research-driven and standards-based models, Japan’s inclusion of moral and citizenship education in creativity development, Australia and Malaysia’s innovation-oriented policies, and Scotland’s focus on teacher reflection to guide curriculum reform.
This comparative analysis illustrates the variety of ways teacher education programs cultivate creativity and provides insights into effective strategies for preparing teachers capable of meeting the evolving demands of contemporary education.

Keywords

Subjects

Ali Mohammadi, G., Jabbari, N., & Niaz Azari, K. (2019). Professional empowerment of teachers in the future perspective and presenting a model. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 18(69), 123–142. [in Persian]
Anagün, Ş., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z., & Yaşar, S. (2016). The development of a 21st-century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: Validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40, 160–175.
Ayvazpour, Z., Hatami, J., Asgari, M. A., Sabaghian, Z., & Ahmadbeigi, F. (2024). A framework for teacher professional competency and its implications for the redesign of teacher education curriculum based on synthesis research. Higher Education Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.22034/hecs.2024.446888.1911 [in Persian]
Bani Amrian, M., Hakimzadeh, R., & Mohammadi Javadipour, M. (2015). A comparative study of the national curriculum of Australia, New Zealand, and Iran in the field of information technology. Research in Education, 1(4), 45–62. [in Persian]
Bavakhani, A., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Keshtiaray, N. (2019). A comparative study of curriculum reform models in teacher education in Australia, Singapore, and Turkey: A new model for Iran. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 2(3), 278–297. [in Persian]
Bell, D. V. J. (2016). Twenty-first century education: Transformative education for sustainability and responsible citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0004
Bundick, M. J., & Tirri, K. (2014). Teacher support and competencies for fostering youth purpose and psychological well-being: Perspectives from two countries. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2014.924357
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2009). Habits of mind across the curriculum: Practical and creative strategies for teachers. ASCD.
Elhamian, N. (2018). A comparative study of teacher education systems in Finland, Malaysia, Canada, and Iran. New Strategies in Teacher Education, 4(6), 55–72. (in Persian)
Farhangian University. (2019). Teacher Education Curriculum Framework. Tehran: Farhangian University Press.
Fletcher, M., & Macuga, P. (2004). The theory–practice nexus in teacher education: Preparing students for work. In Educating: Weaving research into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 69–80). Griffith University, School of Cognition, Language and Special Education.
Garay, I. S., & Quintana, M. G. B. (2019). 21st century skills: An analysis of theoretical frameworks to guide educational innovation processes in the Chilean context. In The International Research & Innovation Forum (pp. 37–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22493-6_4
Gore, J. (2015). Evidence of impact of teacher education programs: A focus on classroom observation. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/evidence-of-impact-of-teacher-education-programs-a-focus-on-classroom-observation
Hatami, J. (2022). Competency-based curriculum: An undeniable necessity. Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 12(24), 1–15. [in Persian]
Huet, P. (2024). The 21st-century professionalization? Online education as an instrument for bolstering individual welfare and societal equality. Journal of Integrated Global STEM, 1(2), 122–141.
Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2011). South and north—Teacher education policy in England and Scotland: A comparative textual analysis. Scottish Educational Review, 43(2), 70–90.
Jan, H. (2017). Teacher of the 21st century: Characteristics and development. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(9), 50–54.
Karali, Y., & Aydemir, H. (2020). Examining primary school teachers' 21st-century teacher and learner skills. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 17, 50–56.
Kimura, D., & Tatsuno, M. (2017). Advancing 21st-century competencies in Japan. Asia Society: Center for Global Education, 1–37.
Kuloğlu, A., & Karabekmez, V. (2022). The relationship between 21st-century teacher skills and critical thinking skills of classroom teachers. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.1.497
Ledger, S., Ure, C., Burgess, M., & Morrison, C. (2020). Professional experience in Australian initial teacher education: An appraisal of policy and practice. Higher Education Studies, 10(4), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n4p116
Legg-Jack, D. W., & Ndebele, C. (2022). Lecturers’ reflections on emergency remote teaching and learning at a university in South Africa during COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100120
Ligale, L. M. (2025). Redefining Bloom’s taxonomy—Developing a framework for cognitive competence acquisition. Africa Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 10(1), 39–48.
Maaranen, K., Kynäslahti, H., Byman, R., Jyrhämä, R., & Sintonen, S. (2019). Teacher education matters: Finnish teacher educators’ concerns, beliefs, and values. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1581407
Male, B. (2012). The primary curriculum design handbook: Preparing our children for the 21st century. A&C Black.
Marsiti, C. I. R., Santyasa, I. W., Sudatha, I. G. W., & Sudarma, I. K. (2023). The effect of project-based blended learning and students’ creativity on eleventh-grade students’ learning achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16444a
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2018). Rethinking the teaching–learning process and teacher education. Tehran: Madreseh Publications. [in Persian]
Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.124239
Monyai, R. (Ed.). (2019). Teacher education in the 21st century. BoD–Books on Demand.
O’Brien, J. (2021). Teacher education in Scotland: The Donaldson Review and the early phases of teacher learning. Research in Teacher Education, 11(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8q61x
OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en
Patankar, P. S., & Jadhav, M. S. (2013). Role of teachers in curriculum development for teacher education. Paper presented at the National Conference on Challenges in Teacher Education, Physical Education and Sports, Kolhapur, India.
Perkins, D. (2014). Future wise: Educating our children for a changing world. John Wiley & Sons.
Rozeski, D. L. (2012). 21st-century students—20th-century teaching models: Instructional strategies to increase student achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Does the pandemic help us make education more equitable? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09284-4
Santosa, M. H. (2019a). Introduction to core skills and its best practices in Indonesian classrooms. In Penerapan core skills di kelas-kelas di Indonesia (pp. 7–23).
Santosa, M. H. (2019b). Student-centered learning (Part 1/5: New paradigm in language teaching and 21st-century skills). English Language Teaching Journal, 7(2), 45–56.
Seng, G. H., Muhamad, M., & Kiely, R. (2020). Integration of 21st-century learning skills and teacher characteristics in ESL classrooms: The case of Malaysia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7561–7566. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082544
Singh, C. K. S., Ong, E. T., Tunku, T. M., Tarsame, S. M. S., & Nor, M. A. (2020). Quality teachers of the 21st century: An overview of theories and practice. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 1481–1494.
Smith, I. (2010). Reviewing Scottish teacher education for the 21st century: Let collaborative partnership flourish. Scottish Educational Review, 42(2), 33–56.
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2011). Intelligence (as related to creativity). In Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 673–676). Elsevier.
Tirri, K. (2016). Holistic perspectives on gifted education for the 21st century. In D. Ambrose & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Giftedness and talents in the 21st century (pp. 101–110). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-528-3_8
Viinikka, K. K., Ubani, M., Lipiäinen, T., & Kallioniemi, A. (2019). 21st-century skills and Finnish student teachers’ perceptions about the ideal RE teacher today and in the future. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(8), 75–97.
Villa, F. V., & Guerra, M. (2017). The creativity innovation role in a school by skills. Excellence and Innovation in Learning and Teaching: Research and Practices, 2(1),
Zolfaghari, M. (2020). Linking Theory and Practice in Iranian Teacher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Tehran: Institute for Educational Research.

  • Receive Date 02 September 2025
  • Accept Date 01 November 2025